-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 508
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix code scanning alerts #6108
fix code scanning alerts #6108
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 16 of 16 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r2, 4 of 4 files at r3, 2 of 2 files at r4, 1 of 1 files at r5, 2 of 2 files at r6, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 8 unresolved discussions (waiting on @osalyk)
.github/actions/pmem_benchmark_run/action.yml
line 36 at r3 (raw file):
- name: Archive logs if: always() uses: actions/upload-artifact@50769540e7f4bd5e21e526ee35c689e35e0d6874 # v4
.
Suggestion:
# v4.4.0
.github/workflows/docker_rebuild.yml
line 40 at r1 (raw file):
steps: - name: Clone the git repo uses: actions/checkout@692973e3d937129bcbf40652eb9f2f61becf3332 # v4
Please use the exact tag. v4
will be changed whenever a new v4.x.y will be released.
Please apply to all occurrences.
Suggestion:
# v4.1.7
.github/workflows/scan_codeql.yml
line 39 at r4 (raw file):
- name: Initialize CodeQL uses: github/codeql-action/init@be8b74c09c1778bcdbea38e1a45efea2cb73e18c # v2
I believe we should use v3.26.6
consequently in all instances. No point in using two versions.
.github/workflows/scan_codeql.yml
line 47 at r4 (raw file):
- name: CodeQL scan uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@be8b74c09c1778bcdbea38e1a45efea2cb73e18c # v2
v3.26.6?
.github/workflows/scan_coverage.yml
line 42 at r5 (raw file):
- name: Upload coverage to Codecov uses: codecov/codecov-action@e28ff129e5465c2c0dcc6f003fc735cb6ae0c673 # v4
.
Suggestion:
# v4.5.0
.github/workflows/scan_log_calls.yml
line 33 at r6 (raw file):
- name: Upload artifacts if: steps.log_calls_diff.outputs.length != '0' uses: actions/upload-artifact@ff15f0306b3f739f7b6fd43fb5d26cd321bd4de5 # v3
I think we uniformly use v4.4.0.
.github/workflows/scan_stack_usage.yml
line 80 at r6 (raw file):
- name: Upload artifacts uses: actions/upload-artifact@ff15f0306b3f739f7b6fd43fb5d26cd321bd4de5 # v3
I think we uniformly use v4.4.0.
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml
line 72 at r4 (raw file):
# Commenting out will disable upload of results to your repo's Code Scanning dashboard - name: "Upload to code-scanning" uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@4dd16135b69a43b6c8efb853346f8437d92d3c93 # v3
.
Suggestion:
# v3.26.6
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 0 of 18 files reviewed, 8 unresolved discussions (waiting on @janekmi)
.github/actions/pmem_benchmark_run/action.yml
line 36 at r3 (raw file):
Previously, janekmi (Jan Michalski) wrote…
.
Done.
.github/workflows/docker_rebuild.yml
line 40 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, janekmi (Jan Michalski) wrote…
Please use the exact tag.
v4
will be changed whenever a new v4.x.y will be released.
Please apply to all occurrences.
Done.
.github/workflows/scan_codeql.yml
line 39 at r4 (raw file):
Previously, janekmi (Jan Michalski) wrote…
I believe we should use
v3.26.6
consequently in all instances. No point in using two versions.
Done.
.github/workflows/scan_codeql.yml
line 47 at r4 (raw file):
Previously, janekmi (Jan Michalski) wrote…
v3.26.6?
Done.
.github/workflows/scan_coverage.yml
line 42 at r5 (raw file):
Previously, janekmi (Jan Michalski) wrote…
.
Done.
.github/workflows/scan_log_calls.yml
line 33 at r6 (raw file):
Previously, janekmi (Jan Michalski) wrote…
I think we uniformly use v4.4.0.
Done.
.github/workflows/scan_stack_usage.yml
line 80 at r6 (raw file):
Previously, janekmi (Jan Michalski) wrote…
I think we uniformly use v4.4.0.
Done.
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml
line 72 at r4 (raw file):
Previously, janekmi (Jan Michalski) wrote…
.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 9 of 18 files at r7, 6 of 6 files at r9, 2 of 2 files at r10, 1 of 1 files at r11, all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @osalyk)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 18 of 18 files at r7, 1 of 1 files at r8, 6 of 6 files at r9, 2 of 2 files at r10, 1 of 1 files at r11, all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @osalyk)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status:
complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @osalyk)
https://github.com/pmem/pmdk/security/code-scanning
This change isdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0bb7/d0bb7f7625ca5bf5c3cf7a2b7a514cf841ab8395" alt="Reviewable"